June 2nd, 2009
BEIJING — Even as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told state television on Tuesday that his counterparts in Chinese government are confident of their massive investment in U.S. dollars, ordinary Beijingers remain skeptical.
While Chinese government officials haven’t confirmed the confidence of which Geithner spoke, the regular folks of Beijing are shaking their heads about putting so many eggs in the American basket — and feeling they don’t get much in return.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090602/street-view-Geithner
June 2nd, 2009
BEIJING — There are a million moral and ethical arguments against eating dogs.
Westerners like to make these arguments, while Chinese who enjoy the meal refute them with a polite scoff. The dogs you eat, they say, are different than those you keep as pets. The meat is healthy, especially in winter. But a growing body of evidence could make everyone think twice, as new studies emerge indicating that putting Fido on a plate is potentially harmful and even deadly to humans.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090529/the-link-between-eating-dogs-and-catching-rabies
May 12th, 2009
BEIJING, China — Amid China’s greatest natural disaster in a generation — the massive earthquake that struck Sichuan province last May 12 — signs of hope emerged that the tragedy might change society.
But a year after the quake left nearly 90,000 people dead or missing, that initial promise of a more open and volunteer-minded China has faded. Back then, many predicted that Chinese volunteerism would blossom, and a freer press would result. Those predictions have yet to take root.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090511/sichuan-quake-one-year-later
April 7th, 2009
BEIJING — A museum devoted to Chinese businessmen evokes images of drab exhibition halls filled with scale models of earnest middle managers and blueprints of factory expansions.
Yet the Chinese Businessman Museum tells the fascinating tale of an ancient tribe of merchants who revolutionized the way business is done in China. They are credited with inventing the country’s first banking system, establishing a nationwide business alliance that would put modern networking to shame and, oddly enough, turning Maotai into the country’s most famous liquor.
They are the Jinshang merchants of Shanxi province, who for 500 years were China’s business elite — a reign that collapsed with the monarchy and stayed buried through the decades of chaos that ruled China through the 20th century. With China’s economic rise there is renewed interest in its ancient business luminaries.
The businessman museum, a gorgeous and sprawling complex of gray brick on the southeast edge of Beijing, uses only a portion of its grounds to show off its collection. Inside are 200-year-old contracts and passports, stamps and signboards of merchants and interactive photo and map exhibits. It is, quite simply, an elegant and well-planned museum with an interesting tale.
It is also dead empty.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090407/businessmen-star-new-chinese-museum
April 1st, 2009
BEIJING — China has stepped up its play for more power in calling the shots in world economic affairs — suggesting a new global currency, demanding market reforms and grasping for more say, generally, in world financial affairs.
But what does this increasing government self-confidence mean to Chinese people? With the country facing rising unemployment and potential social unrest arising from the global crisis, questions abound on whether China can and should assume a leadership role as the G20 economic summit convenes this week in London.
There seems no better place to find out what young Chinese think of their country’s power position than “Beida,” the affectionate shorthand by which Beijingers know Peking University — ranked among the world’s top centers of higher learning and China’s haven of relative ideological freedom.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/commerce/090331/chinas-rise-through-the-eyes-its-young
February 26th, 2009
TAIYUAN, China — The residents of Taiyuan measure their air pollution in dirty clothes.
In years past, when China’s boom created endless demand for this area’s coal, iron and steel, a white shirt stayed fresh only a few hours, turning black around the collar and sleeves before day’s end. When the government shut down hundreds of factories in and around Taiyuan ahead of the Olympics last year, clean shirts began to last two days. Now, six months into an economic slowdown that has snuffed demand for power and metals from China’s furnace, a man’s suit can stay crisp for three days without laundering.
“I don’t need to do so much laundry these days,” said Zhao Jihong, a 25-year-old environmentalist who works to encourage local companies to adopt pollution controls.
If there is a bright spot amid the global economic slump for China, it may be in the air — and in the water and soil. Dramatically slowed production in recent months has meant less pollution. In notoriously filthy places like Taiyuan, the capital of China’s coal country, that means more relatively blue skies and healthier breathing.
Grayish-brown smog still hangs in the air over Taiyuan, which has consistently ranked among the world’s most polluted cities. Yet even with the acrid smell and black traces of coal dust all around, its residents maintain things have improved immensely.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090226/bad-economy-better-lungs
July 27th, 2008
I was one of the first foreign journalists since March 2008 allowed to travel independently to Tibet, although regulations still require hiring a government-approved guide. During my five-day trip, I sent dispatches from Lhasa for the REVIEW.
July 24, 2008
After only a few hours in Lhasa, one thing is crystal clear: Four months after the riots and subsequent crackdown, controls may be easing somewhat but this remains a very tightly controlled city under intense guard by Chinese military and police.
Uniformed soldiers and police stand watch in pairs and trios at most major intersections throughout the Barkhor district, a ring around the Jokhang Temple – one of the most sacred places in Tibetan Buddhism. As the faithful masses walk praying in a clockwise-turning throng around the temple they barely notice the guards and the police and soldiers pay little attention to the crowd. There is no visible aggression or animosity between the Tibetans and Chinese security forces. Life appears to be slowly getting back to some form of normal.
Chinese tour groups are in evidence, as are a handful of Western tourists. One of the few foreign aid workers who has remained in Lhasa throughout the chaos of 2008 said the city finally is regaining a sense of normalcy, despite the continued police and military presence. Still there is much talk in hushed tones of Chinese repercussions against Tibetans involved in the riots, and the need for extreme caution. In other words, things are calmed but not healed.
Read the whole diary at the Far Eastern Economic Review: http://www.feer.com/politics/2008/july/lhasa-diary
July 15th, 2008
When an acquaintance here in Beijing called the other week and asked if I wanted to buy a ticket for the opening ceremony of the Olympics on August 7, I must admit I was intrigued. It’s arguably the hottest ticket in town and long sold-out (with countless numbers of tickets going gratis to sponsors and who-knows-who-else). Even though Stephen Spielberg is no longer involved, the ceremony is sure to be a spectacle. Then she told me the asking price: 40,000 yuan, or about $5,800, for a ticket that originally cost about $300. After a good chuckle, I passed. Turns out that was a bargain. Chinese media reports today that an opening ceremony pass purchased in the ticket lottery at $725 was sold second-hand for $30,500. Ticket madness.
July 14th, 2008
Changgucheng, China – Three years ago, local government officials told farmers in this village of 7,00 residents to stop using water from a reservoir near their wheat and corn fields. If they needed water, the farmers were told, they would have to dig a well.
“They said there wasn’t enough water,’’ Jia Jianguo, 60, recalled.
At their own expense, the farmers dug a 90-foot well. But even though the new irrigation system worked fine, the locals have been forced to pool their meager resources each year that the water recedes to keep their crops alive. The well is now 135 feet deep and the groundwater is seeping away as fast as the province’s increasingly scarce water supplies are being channeled some 100 miles southwest to the thirsty capital of 15 million, Beijing.
Read more at Sfgate.com
June 1st, 2008
Death threats against foreign reporters, government condemnation of international media, increasing political pressure on Chinese sources: This is not the free, open reporting climate the Chinese government promised for the 2008 Olympics.
Yet it is reality in the months leading up to the Summer Games in August, following the March eruption of violent protests in Tibet, the subsequent world outcry over the Chinese government’s treatment of Tibetans and the ensuing public relations fiasco that was the global Olympic torch relay. As international criticism of China for human rights abuses grows louder, nationalists and government officials have singled out outsiders for scorn, blaming them for inciting the world’s displeasure with China. Joining the French on the hot seat of derision are the international media.
Early in April, after returning from a government-chaperoned reporting trip to the aftermath of demonstrations in the Tibetan capital, Lhasa, Associated Press Beijing Bureau Chief Charles Hutzler started getting harassing calls on his mobile phone. For five or six days, 20 to 30 calls rolled in every hour (except during lunch and dinner and late at night), with a nearly equal number of text messages. Most passed on petty insults and patriotic curses; some threatened to kill him. Though he stopped answering his cell phone and switched to a backup line, Hutzler says the several callers he did talk to shared one thing: They hadn’t read anything he had written.
Read More at American Journalism Review